MicroProfile Reactive Messaging
Specification: MicroProfile Reactive Messaging Specification Version: 3.0 Status: Final Release: August 31, 2022
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018, 2022 Eclipse Foundation.
Eclipse Foundation Specification License
By using and/or copying this document, or the Eclipse Foundation document from which this statement is linked, you (the licensee) agree that you have read, understood, and will comply with the following terms and conditions:
Permission to copy, and distribute the contents of this document, or the Eclipse Foundation document from which this statement is linked, in any medium for any purpose and without fee or royalty is hereby granted, provided that you include the following on ALL copies of the document, or portions thereof, that you use:
-
link or URL to the original Eclipse Foundation document.
-
All existing copyright notices, or if one does not exist, a notice (hypertext is preferred, but a textual representation is permitted) of the form: "Copyright (c) [$date-of-document] Eclipse Foundation, Inc. <<url to this license>>"
Inclusion of the full text of this NOTICE must be provided. We request that authorship attribution be provided in any software, documents, or other items or products that you create pursuant to the implementation of the contents of this document, or any portion thereof.
No right to create modifications or derivatives of Eclipse Foundation documents is granted pursuant to this license, except anyone may prepare and distribute derivative works and portions of this document in software that implements the specification, in supporting materials accompanying such software, and in documentation of such software, PROVIDED that all such works include the notice below. HOWEVER, the publication of derivative works of this document for use as a technical specification is expressly prohibited.
The notice is:
"Copyright (c) [$date-of-document] Eclipse Foundation. This software or document includes material copied from or derived from [title and URI of the Eclipse Foundation specification document]."
Disclaimers
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS," AND THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND THE ECLIPSE FOUNDATION MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR TITLE; THAT THE CONTENTS OF THE DOCUMENT ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE; NOR THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH CONTENTS WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY THIRD PARTY PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS OR OTHER RIGHTS.
THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND THE ECLIPSE FOUNDATION WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF ANY USE OF THE DOCUMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTENTS THEREOF.
The name and trademarks of the copyright holders or the Eclipse Foundation may NOT be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to this document or its contents without specific, written prior permission. Title to copyright in this document will at all times remain with copyright holders. :sectnums:
Rationale
State-of-the-art systems must be able to adapt themselves to emerging needs and requirements, such as market change and user expectations but also fluctuating load and inevitable failures. Leading-edge applications are capable of dynamic and adaptive capabilities aiming to provide responsive systems. While microservices aim to offer this agility, HTTP-based connecting tissue tends to fail to provide the required runtime adaptations, especially when facing failures.
Asynchronous communication allows temporal decoupling of services in a microservice based architecture. This temporal decoupling is necessary if communication is to be enabled to occur regardless of when the parties involved in the communication are running, whether they are loaded or overloaded, and whether they are successfully processing messages or failing.
In contrast, synchronous communication couples services together, binding their uptime, failure, and handling of the load to each other. In a chain of synchronous interactions, the entire conversation can only be successful if all parties in the chain are responsive - if they are all running, processing messages successfully, and not overloaded. If just one party has a problem, all effectively exhibit the same problem. Therefore, systems of microservices relying on synchronous HTTP or relying on synchronous protocols tend to be fragile, and failures limit their availability. Indeed, in a microservice-based architecture, temporal coupling results in a fragile system, with resilience and scaling properties that are worse than a monolith, hence, it is essential for microservice based architectures to embrace asynchronous communication as much as possible.
The role of the MicroProfile Reactive Messaging specification is to deliver a way to build systems of microservices promoting both location transparency and temporal decoupling, enforcing asynchronous communication between the different parts of the system.
Reactive Systems
Reactive Systems provide an architecture style to deliver responsive systems. By infusing asynchronous messaging passing at the core of the system, applications enforcing the reactive system’s characteristics are inherently resilient and become more elastic by scaling up and down the number of message consumers.
Microservices as part of reactive systems interact using messages. The location and temporal decoupling, promoted by this interaction mechanism, enable numerous benefits such as:
-
Better failure handling as the temporal decoupling enables message brokers to resend or reroute messages in the case of remote service failures.
-
Improved elasticity as under fluctuating load the system can decide to scale up and down some of the microservices.
-
The ability to introduce new features more easily as components are more loosely coupled by receiving and publishing messages.
The MicroProfile Reactive Messaging specification aims to deliver applications embracing the characteristics of reactive systems.
On JMS and Message Driven Beans
Jakarta EE offers JMS and Message Driven Beans for handling asynchronous communication; however, there are some problems with these specifications:
-
Both are designed for a technology landscape where messaging was typically on the edge of the system to hand control of a transaction from one system to another; consequently, these technologies can appear heavyweight when used between microservices.
-
It is assumed in their design that consistency is handled using distributed transactions. However, many message brokers, popular in microservice deployments, such as Apache Kafka, Amazon Kinesis and Azure Event Hubs, do not support XA transactions, rather, message acknowledgment is handled using offsets with at least once delivery guarantees.
-
They do not have support for asynchronous IO; it is assumed that message processing is done on a single thread, however, many modern specifications are moving to asynchronous IO.
Hence a lighter weight, reactive solution to messaging is desirable for MicroProfile to ensure microservices written using MicroProfile are able to meet the demands required by the architecture.
Use cases
MicroProfile Reactive Messaging aims to provide a way to connect event-driven microservices. The key characteristics of the specification make it versatile and suitable for building different types of architecture and applications.
First, asynchronous interactions with different services and resources can be implemented using Reactive Messaging. Typically, asynchronous database drivers can be used in conjunction with Reactive Messaging to read and write into a data store in a non-blocking and asynchronous manner.
When building microservices, the CQRS and event-sourcing patterns provide an answer to the data sharing between microservices. Reactive Messaging can also be used as the foundation to CQRS and Event-Sourcing mechanism, as these patterns embrace message-passing as core communication pattern.
IOT applications, dealing with events from various devices, and data streaming applications can also be implemented using Reactive Messaging. The application receives events or messages, process them, transform them, and may forward them to another microservices. It allows for more fluid architecture for building data-centric applications.
Architecture
The Reactive Messaging specification defines a development model for declaring CDI beans producing, consuming and processing messages. The communication between these components uses Reactive Streams.
This specification relies on Eclipse MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators and CDI.
Concepts
This section describes the different concepts introduced by the Reactive Messaging specification
Overall architecture
An application using Reactive Messaging is composed of CDI beans consuming, producing and processing messages.
These messages can be wholly internal to the application or can be sent and received via different message brokers.
Application’s beans contain methods annotated with @Incoming
and @Outgoing
annotations.
A method with an @Incoming
annotation consumes messages from a channel.
A method with an @Outgoing
annotation publishes messages to a channel.
A method with both an @Incoming
and an @Outgoing
annotation is a message processor, it consumes messages from a channel, does some transformation to them, and publishes messages to another channel.
Channel
A channel is a name indicating which source or destination of messages is used.
Channels are opaque Strings
.
There are two types of channel:
-
Internal channels are local to the application. They allows implementing multi-step processing where several beans from the same application form a chain of processing.
-
Channels can be connected to remote brokers or various message transport layers such as Apache Kafka or to an AMQP broker. These channels are managed by connectors.
If a component receives messages from a channel, we call this channel an upstream channel. If a component produces messages to a channel, we call this channel a downstream channel. Messages flow from upstream to downstream until it reaches a final consumer.
Message
At the core of the Reactive Messaging specification is the concept of message. A message is an envelope wrapping a payload. A message is sent to a specific channel and, when received and processed successfully, acknowledged.
Reactive Messaging application components are addressable recipients which await the arrival of messages on a channel and react to them, otherwise lying dormant.
Messages are represented by the org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
class.
This interface is intentionally kept minimal. The aim is that connectors will provide their own implementations with additional metadata that is relevant to that connector.
For instance, a KafkaMessage
would provide access to the topic and partition.
The org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#getPayload
method retrieves the wrapped payload.
The org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#ack
method acknowledges the message.
The org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#nack
method reports a negative acknowledgement.
Note that the ack
and nack
methods are asynchronous as acknowledgement is generally an asynchronous process.
Plain messages are created using:
-
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#of(T)
- wraps the given payload, no acknowledgement -
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#of(T, java.util.function.Supplier<java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage<java.lang.Void>>)
- wraps the given payload and provides the acknowledgment logic -
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#of(Supplier<CompletionStage<Void>> ack, Function<Throwable, CompletionStage<Void>> nack)
- wraps the given payload and provides the acknowledgment and negative acknowledgment logic
You can also create new Message
instances by copying the content from an original message using the withX
methods:
// Create a new message with a new payload, but using the ack and nack functions from `message`
Message<T> newMessage = message.withPayload(newPayload);
// Create a new message with a new ack and nack logic, but using the original payload
Message<T> another = message
.withNack(...)
.withAck(...);
Message consumption with @Incoming
The org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Incoming
annotation is used on a method from a CDI bean to indicate that the method consumes messages from the specified channel:
@Incoming("my-channel") (1)
public CompletionStage<Void> consume(Message<String> message) { (2)
return message.ack();
}
-
my-channel
is the channel -
the method is called for every message sent to the
my-channel
channel
Reactive Messaging supports various forms of method signatures. This is detailed in the next section.
Remember that Reactive Messaging interactions are assembled from Reactive Streams.
A method annotated with @Incoming
is a Reactive Streams subscriber and so consumes messages that fit with the message signature and its annotations.
Note that the handling of the Reactive Streams protocol, such as subscriptions and back pressure, is managed by the Reactive Messaging implementation.
The MicroProfile Reactive Streams specification used as a foundation for this version of Reactive Messaging is a single subscriber model where a stream
Publisher
is connected to a single Subscriber
which controls back pressure. This implies that a Reactive Messaging channel
should appear in a single @Incoming
annotation. The annotation of more than one @Incoming
method to be associated with the
same channel is not supported and will cause an error during deployment.
Uncaught exceptions in the messaging methods are not propagated as errors to downstream, nor they are canceling the upstream.
From the user perspective, whether the incoming messages comes from co-located beans or a remote message broker is transparent.
However, the user may decide to consume a specific subclass of Message
(e.g. KafkaMessage
in the following example) if the user is aware of this characteristic:
@Incoming("my-kafka-topic")
public CompletionStage<Void> consume(KafkaMessage<String> message) { (1)
return message.ack();
}
-
Explicit consumption of a
KafkaMessage
Message production with @Outgoing
The org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Outgoing
annotation is used to annotate a method from a CDI bean to indicate that the method publishes messages to a specified channel:
@Outgoing("my-channel") (1)
public Message<String> publish() { (2)
return Message.of("hello"); (3)
}
-
my-channel
is the targeted channel -
the method is called for every consumer request
-
you can create a plain
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
usingorg.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message#of(T)
Reactive Messaging supports various forms of method signatures. This is detailed in the next section.
A method annotated with @Outgoing
is a Reactive Streams publisher and so publishes messages according to the requests it receives.
The downstream @Incoming
method or outgoing connector with a matching channel name will be linked to this publisher. Only a single method can
be annotated with @Outgoing
for a particular channel name. Having the same channel name in more than one @Outgoing
annotated method is not
supported and will result in an error during deployment.
Method consuming and producing
A method can combine the @Incoming
and @Outgoing
annotation and will then act as a Reactive Streams processor:
@Incoming("my-incoming-channel") (1)
@Outgoing("my-outgoing-channel") (2)
public Message<String> process(Message<String> message) {
return message.withPayload(message.getPayload().toUpperCase()); (3)
}
-
The incoming channel
-
The outgoing channel
-
Use the
withPayload
method to preserve theack
andnack
functions
Having the same channel appear in the @Outgoing
and @Incoming
annotations of a processor is not supported and will result in an error during deployment.
Connectors
The application can receive and forward messages from various message brokers or transport layers. For instance, an application can be connected to a Kafka cluster, an AMQP broker or an MQTT server.
Reactive Messaging Connectors are extensions managing the communication with a specific transport technology. They are responsible for mapping a specific channel to remote sink or source of messages. This mapping is configured in the application configuration. Note that an implementation may provide various ways to configure the mapping, but support for MicroProfile Config as a configuration source is mandatory.
Connector implementations are associated with a name corresponding to a messaging transport, such as Apache Kafka, Amazon Kinesis, RabbitMQ or Apache ActiveMQ.
For instance, an hypothetical Kafka connector could be associated with the following name: acme.kafka
.
This name is indicated using a qualifier on the connector implementation.
The user can associate a channel with this connector using the associated name:
mp.messaging.incoming.my-kafka-topic.connector=acme.kafka (1)
-
the name associated with the connector.
The configuration format is detailed later in this document.
The Reactive Messaging implementation is responsible for finding the connector implementation associated with the given name in the user configuration. If the connector cannot be found, the deployment of the application must be failed.
The Reactive Messaging specification provides an SPI to implement connectors.
Message stream operation
Message stream operation occurs according to the principles of reactive programming.
The back pressure mechanism of reactive streams means that a publisher will not send data to a subscriber unless there are outstanding subscriber requests.
This implies that data flow along the stream is enabled by the first request for data received by the publisher.
For methods that are annotated with @Incoming
and @Outgoing
this data flow control is handled automatically by the underlying system which will call the @Incoming
and @Outgoing
methods as appropriate.
Although @Incoming and @Outgoing methods remain callable from Java code, calling them directly will not affect the reactive streams they are associated with.
For example, calling an @Outgoing annotated method from user code will not post a message on a message queue and calling an @Incoming method cannot be used to read a message.
Enabling this would bypass the automatic back pressure mechanism that is one of the benefits of the specification.
The @Incoming and @Outgoing method annotations are used to declaratively define the stream which is then run by the implementation of MicroProfile Reactive Messaging without the user’s code needing to handle concerns such as subscriptions or flow control within the stream.
|
Supported CDI scopes
Implementations of the Reactive Messaging specification must support at least the following CDI scopes:
-
@ApplicationScoped
beans -
@Dependent
beans
The following code gives an example of a bean annotated with @ApplicationScoped
:
@ApplicationScoped
public class ApplicationScopeBeans {
@Outgoing("source")
public Publisher<Integer> source() {
return ReactiveStreams.of(id).buildRs();
}
@Incoming("source")
@Outgoing("output")
public int process(int i) {
return i + 1;
}
@Incoming("output")
public void sink(int v) {
System.out.println(v);
}
}
Implementations can provide support for other scopes. However the behavior is not defined.
Supported method signatures
The signature of message stream methods can have a number of different distinct types, offering differing levels of power and simplicity to application developers. Different shapes are supported depending on whether the method is a publisher, subscriber or processor, for example, a publishing stream supports returning MicroProfile Reactive Streams PublisherBuilder
, but not SubscriberBuilder
, the inverse is true for a subscribing stream.
This section lists the methods signatures that must be supported by the Reactive Messaging implementation.
Implementations must validate that the stream shape matches the @Outgoing
and @Incoming
annotations, if they don’t, a CDI definition exception should be raised to the CDI container during initialization.
It’s important to remember that users must not call these methods directly. They are invoked by the Reactive Messaging implementation following the Reactive Streams protocol.
Also the method must be implemented in a non-blocking fashion. For blocking transformations, asynchronous variants can be used.
assembly time is when the Reactive Messaging implementation initializes itself and creates the different bean instances and connects them together.
If the implementation cannot find a incoming of outgoing channel, a DeploymentException must be thrown when the application starts.
|
In the following lists, Message can be an implementation of the Message interface.
|
Methods producing data
Signature | Behavior | Invocation |
---|---|---|
|
Returns a stream of |
Method called once at assembly time. |
|
Returns a stream of payload of type |
Method called once at assembly time. |
|
Returns a stream of |
Method called once at assembly time. |
|
Returns a stream of payload associated with the channel |
Method called once at subscription time. |
|
Produces an infinite stream of |
This method is called for each request made by the subscriber. |
|
Produces an infinite stream of payload associated with the channel |
This method is called for each request made by the subscriber. |
|
Produces an infinite stream of |
This method is called for each request made by the subscriber. |
|
Produces an infinite stream of payload associated with the channel |
This method is called for each request made by the subscriber. |
Methods consuming data
Signature | Behavior | Invocation |
---|---|---|
|
Returns a |
The method is called only once to retrieve the |
|
Returns a |
The method is called only once to retrieve the |
|
Returns a |
The method is called only once at assembly time to retrieve a |
|
Returns a |
The method is called only once at assembly time to retrieve a |
|
Consumes the payload. |
This method is called for every |
|
Consumes the |
This method is called for every |
|
Consumes the payload asynchronously |
This method is called for every |
Methods processing data
Signature | Behavior | Invocation |
---|---|---|
|
Returns a Reactive Streams processor consuming incoming |
This method is called once; at assembly time. |
|
Returns a Reactive Streams processor consuming incoming payload instances and produces payload instances. |
This method is called once; at assembly time. |
|
Returns a |
This method is called once; at assembly time. |
|
Returns a Reactive Streams processor that consuming incoming payload instances and produces payload instances. |
This method is called once; at assembly time. |
|
Returns a Reactive Streams |
This method is called for every incoming message. Implementations must not call the method subsequently until the stream from the previously returned |
|
Returns a Reactive Streams |
This method is called for every incoming message. Implementations must not call the method subsequently until the stream from the previously returned |
|
Returns a |
This method is called for every incoming message. Implementations must not call the method subsequently until the stream built from the previously returned |
|
Returns a |
This method is called for every incoming message. Implementations must not call the method subsequently until the stream built from the previously returned |
|
Returns a |
This method is called for every incoming message. Implementations must not call the method subsequently until the previous call must have returned. |
|
Returns a payload for each incoming payload.
The Reactive Messaging implementation is responsible for unwrapping the _payload from the incoming |
This method is called for every incoming message. Implementations must not call the method subsequently until the previous call must have returned. |
|
Produces a |
This method is called for every incoming message. Never concurrently. The implementations must wait until the completion of the previously returned |
|
Produces a payload for each incoming payload. This method returns a |
This method is called for every incoming payload. Never concurrently. The implementations must wait until the completion of the previously returned |
|
Applies a transformation to the incoming stream of |
This method is called once, at assembly time. |
|
Applies a transformation to the stream represented by the |
This method is called once, at assembly time. |
|
Applies a transformation to the incoming streams of payloads. This method is used to manipulate streams and apply stream transformations. |
This method is called once, at assembly time. |
|
Applies a transformation to the stream represented by the |
This method is called once, at assembly time. |
Examples of simple method streams
The simplest shape that an application may use is a simple method. This is a method that accepts an incoming message, and possibly publishes an outgoing message:
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
public Message<O> process(Message<I> msg) {
return convert(msg);
}
In the above example, the stream is both a publishing and subscribing stream, with a 1:1 mapping of incoming to outgoing messages.
Asynchronous processing may also be used, by returning a CompletionStage
:
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
public CompletionStage<Message<O>> process(Message<I> msg) {
return asyncConvert(msg);
}
If the method is not @Outgoing
annotated, then the returned value is ignored - however, note that for asynchronous methods, the returned CompletionStage
is still important for determining when message processing has completed successfully, for the purposes of message acknowledgement.
When there is no @Outgoing
annotation, void
may also be returned.
In addition to Message
, implementations must allow:
-
payloads (the content wrapped in a
Message
) -
implementation of the
Message
interface
Examples of methods using Reactive Streams or MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators types
For more power, developers may use Reactive Streams instances. Reactive Streams shaped methods accept no parameters, and return one of the following:
-
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.streams.operators.PublisherBuilder
-
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.streams.operators.SubscriberBuilder
-
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.streams.operators.ProcessorBuilder
-
org.reactivestreams.Publisher
-
org.reactivestreams.Subscriber
-
org.reactivestreams.Processor
Implementations may optionally support other types, such as JDK9 Flow publishers, subscribers and processors, or other representations of Reactive Streams. Application developers are recommended to use the MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators builders in order to allow for the highest level of portability.
For example, here’s a message processor:
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
public PublisherBuilder<Message<I>, Message<O>> process() {
return ReactiveStreams.<Message<I>>builder()
.map(this::convert);
}
Implementations must support implementations of the Message interface.
|
Message acknowledgement and negative acknowledgement
Acknowledgement is an important part of message processing. Acknowlegement indicates that a message has been processed correctly. A negative-acknoledgement indicates that a message was not processed correctly.
Messages are either acknowledged (positively or negatively) explicitly, or implicitly by the implementation.
All messages must be acknowledged either positively or negatively. What happens when a message is acknowledged depends on the source of the message, often on the connector.
Positive acknowledgement
Acknowledgement for the @Incoming
messages is controlled by the org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Acknowledgment
annotation.
The annotation allows configuring the acknowledgement strategy among:
-
MANUAL
- the user is responsible for the acknowledgement, by calling theMessage#ack()
method, so the Reactive Messaging implementation does not apply implicit acknowledgement -
PRE_PROCESSING
- the Reactive Messaging implementation acknowledges the message before the annotated method or processing is executed -
POST_PROCESSING
- the Reactive Messaging implementation acknowledges the message once:-
the method or processing completes if the method does not emit data
-
when the emitted data is acknowledged
-
Each method signature type has different defaults and can implement different acknowledgement policies.
If the Acknowledgment
annotation is not set, the default policy is applied.
Method only annotated with @Outgoing do not support acknowledgement as they don’t receive an input Message .
|
When a method annotated with @Incoming
defines its acknowledgement policy to be PRE_PROCESSING
or POST_PROCESSING
, the Reactive Messaging implementation is responsible for the acknowledgement of the message.
When the POST_PROCESSING
policy is used, the incoming message is acknowledged when the outgoing message is acknowledged.
Thus, it creates a chain of acknowledgements, making sure that the messages produced by an IncomingConnectorFactory
are only acknowledged when the dispatching of the messages has been completed successfully.
The MANUAL
strategy indicates that the incoming message acknowledgement is managed by the user code.
The MANUAL
strategy is often used to acknowledge incoming messages when the produced messages are acknowledged.
For example, in the next snippet, the received KafkaMessage
is acknowledged when the produced message is acknowledged.
@Incoming("data")
@Outgoing("sink")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.MANUAL)
public Message<Integer> process(KafkaMessage<String, Integer> input) {
return Message.of(processThePayload(input.getPayload(), () -> input.ack()));
}
Specifying NONE
as acknowledgment strategy allows for this method to complete processing and return without handling
acknowledgment and for this to be considered valid behavior of the method.
However, if messages were never acknowledged this would result in a build-up of unacknowledged messages in the system as
no automatic acknowledgment will be done when NONE
is specified.
When 'NONE' is specified, each message object’s ack()
method should still be invoked once as part of the overall
processing but this is considered valid behavior either before, during, or after this method’s execution.
The following table indicates the defaults and supported acknowledgement for each supported signature:
Signature | Default Acknowledgement Strategy | Supported Strategies |
---|---|---|
|
Manual |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the |
|
Post-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the |
|
Manual |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the |
|
Post-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the |
|
Post-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the method returns) |
|
Manual |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the returned |
|
Post-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the returned |
|
Manual |
None, Pre-Processing, Manual |
|
Pre-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing Post-Processing can be optionally supported by implementations, however it requires a 1:1 mapping between the incoming element and the outgoing element. |
|
Manual |
None, Pre-Processing, Manual |
|
Pre-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing Post-Processing can be optionally supported by implementations, however it requires a 1:1 mapping the incoming element and the outgoing element. |
|
Manual |
None, Manual, Pre-Processing |
|
Pre-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing |
|
Manual |
None, Manual, Pre-Processing |
|
Pre-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing |
|
Manual |
None, Manual, Pre-Processing |
|
Post-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the message wrapping the produced payload is acknowledged) |
|
Manual |
None, Manual, Pre-Processing |
|
Post-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing, Post-Processing (when the message wrapping the produced payload is acknowledged) |
|
Manual |
None, Manual, Pre-Processing |
|
Manual |
None, Manual, Pre-Processing |
|
Pre-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing |
|
Pre-Processing |
None, Pre-Processing |
Invalid acknowledgement policies must be detected and a DeploymentException
raised when the application is deployed.
Acknowledgement Examples
Transiting data may be wrapped in a Message
, which can be used to supply metadata, and also allows messages to be acknowledged.
The contract for acknowledging messages is anything that accepts a Message
is required to acknowledge it.
So, if the application receives an incoming message wrapped in Message
, it is responsible for invoking Message.ack()
, and if the application publish an outgoing message wrapped in Message
, then the spec implementation is responsible for invoking Message.ack()
.
For example, the following application code is incorrect, since it accepts a message wrapped in Message
, but does not acknowledge the messages:
@Incoming("in")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.MANUAL)
public void process(Message<I> msg) {
System.out.println("Got message " + msg.getPayload());
}
Here is a correct implementation:
@Incoming("in")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.MANUAL)
public CompletionStage<Void> process(Message<I> msg) {
System.out.println("Got message " + msg.getPayload());
return msg.ack();
}
This implementation is also correct, since the application receives a payload wrapped in a message.
It’s the implementations responsibility to invoke ack()
on the incoming message:
@Incoming("in")
public void process(I payload) {
System.out.println("Got payload " + payload);
}
When dealing with payloads, the POST_PROCESSING
strategy is the default strategy.
In the following snippet, the incoming payload is transported into a message and unwrapped before calling the method.
The produced result is wrapped into another Message
.
Following the POST_PROCESSING
strategy, the incoming message must only be acknowledged when the output message is acknowledged.
The implementation is responsible to chain the acknowledgements.
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
public O process(I payload) {
...
}
The acknowledgment strategy can be changed.
For instance, using the PRE_PROCESSING
strategy, the incoming message is acknowledged before the method is called.
It also means that the acknowledgment of the outgoing message would not acknowledge the incoming message anymore, as it’s already acknowledged.
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.PRE_PROCESSING)
public O process(I payload) {
...
}
PRE_PROCESSING
can also be used with Messages
:
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.PRE_PROCESSING)
public Message<O> process(Message<I> msg) {
return Message.of(convert(msg.getPayload()));
}
In this case, the message msg
is acknowledged before the method being called.
The outgoing message (returned by the method) does not have to chain the acknowledgment.
The NONE
strategy indicates that the incoming message is not acknowledged and the acknowledgment of the outgoing message would not acknowledge the incoming message anymore.
The NONE
strategy may be used when the incoming messages are acknowledged in another location, or a different mechanism..
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.NONE)
public O process(I payload) {
...
}
The MANUAL
strategy indicates that the acknowledgment is managed by the user code.
The following snippet is particularly useful for processing messages that are also being sent to a destination, as the implementation must not invoke ack
until after the outgoing message has been sent to the destination:
@Incoming("in")
@Outgoing("out")
@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.MANUAL) // Default strategy
public Message<O> process(Message<I> msg) {
return Message.of(convert(msg.getPayload()), msg::ack);
}
The implementation is responsible for enforcing the acknowledgement strategy defined by the user when the @Acknowledgement
policy is used.
If the annotation is not used, the default policy must be enforced.
Negative acknowledgement
Negative acknowledgement indicates a processing failure.
As for the POST_PROCESSING
positive acknowledgement strategy, a nack is propagated from a message to its source if the messages are chained.
When the nack reaches the top of the chain, the source, generally a connector, can handle the failure and act accordingly.
Typically, sending the invalid message to a dead-letter-queue or retrying the delivery are common strategies.
Negative acknowledgement happens automatically if a method annotated with @Incoming
receives a single payload and uses POST_PROCESSING
acknowledgement and throws an exception.
The incoming message is nacked and the thrown exception is passed as reason.
The following method would automatically trigger a nack
if the incoming payload is b
:
@Incoming("data")
@Outgoing("out")
public String process(String s) { (1)
if (s.equalsIgnoreCase("b")) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("b"); (2)
}
return s.toUpperCase();
}
-
POST_PROCESSING
is the default strategy for this signature -
throwing an exception nacks the incoming message
If a method handles payload asynchronously (returns a CompletionStage
), the incoming message is nacked if:
-
the method throws an exception
-
the produced
CompletionStage
is completed exceptionally
@Incoming("data")
@Outgoing("out")
public CompletionStage<String> process(String s) { (1)
if (s.equalsIgnoreCase("b")) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("b"); (2)
}
if (s.equalsIgnoreCase("f")) {
return null; (3)
}
if (s.equalsIgnoreCase("c")) {
CompletableFuture<String> cf = new CompletableFuture<>();
cf.completeExceptionally(new IllegalArgumentException("c")); (4)
return cf;
}
return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(s.toUpperCase());
}
-
POST_PROCESSING
is the default strategy for this signature -
throwing an exception nacks the incoming message
-
returning
null
nacks the incoming message, as it’s illegal to returnnull
asCompletionStage
-
returning a
CompletionStage
failed exceptionally also nacks the incoming message
If the method receives a single Message
, the user is responsible for calling the nack
function:
@Incoming("data")
@Outgoing("out")
public Message<String> process(Message<String> m) { (1)
String s = m.getPayload();
if (s.equalsIgnoreCase("b")) {
// we cannot fail, we must nack explicitly.
m.nack(new IllegalArgumentException("b")); (2)
return null;
}
return m.withPayload(s.toUpperCase());
}
-
MANUAL
is the default strategy for this signature -
throwing an exception would not nack the message, as it may have already been explicitly acked or nacked. Before the exception happens, the user must call the
nack
method.
Methods using the NONE
acknowledgement strategy do not nack the incoming message.
Methods using the PRE_PROCESSING
acknowledgement strategy, the incoming message is not nacked either, as it was already acknowledged.
Connector
Reactive Messaging connects matching @Incoming
and @Outgoing
stream elements running inside the same application.
Additionally, it maps specific channels to external technologies such as Apache Kafka, MQTT, Web Sockets, AMQP, or JMS.
This means that Reactive Messaging can receive messages from virtually any messaging technology and dispatch messages to any messaging technology.
This bridging to an external messaging technology is done using a reactive messaging connector.
Connector concepts
Each connector is responsible for a specific technology. A connector can:
-
act as a Publisher, meaning it retrieves or receives messages from an external messaging technology and publishes them to a reactive stream. The messages will then be sent to a method annotated with
@Incoming
. -
act as a Subscriber, meaning it subscribes to a reactive stream and dispatches messages to an external messaging technology. The messages are received from a method annotated with
@Outgoing
. -
handle both directions.
It’s essential that connectors implement the back-pressure protocol defined by the Reactive Streams specification.
A connector is implemented as a CDI Bean, generally application scoped implementing:
-
the
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.connector.IncomingConnectorFactory
interface to receive messages from an external source; -
the
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.connector.OutgoingConnectorFactory
interface to dispatch messages to an external sink
Depending on the integrated technology, the connector can implement one of the interface or both. |
The bean is a factory called by the Reactive Messaging implementation to create PublisherBuilder
or SubscriberBuilder
objects.
These objects are then connected to methods annotated with @Incoming
or @Outgoing
.
Beans implementing the IncomingConnectorFactory
or OutgoingConnectorFactory
must use the org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.spi.Connector
qualifier.
This qualifier defined the name associated with the connector.
The @Connector
qualifier is used as follows:
package org.eclipse.reactive.sample.kafka;
import org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.spi.*;
@ApplicationScoped
@Connector("acme.kafka")
public class KafkaConnector implements IncomingConnectorFactory, OutgoingConnectorFactory {
// ...
}
Once defined, the user can, in the configuration, refer to this connector using the given name (acme.kafka
in this example).
When the Reactive Messaging implementation processes the configuration, it determines the connector to be used based on the connector
attribute.
Configuration
Reactive Messaging connectors are configured using MicroProfile Config. The implementation processes the global configuration and determines:
-
which channels are defined
-
which connectors are used (using the
connector
) attribute -
the configuration for each channel
The builder methods defined in the IncomingConnectorFactory
and OutgoingConnectorFactory
receive a org.eclipse.microprofile.config.Config
as parameter.
The Config
object contains key-value pairs to configure the connector.
The configuration is specific to the connector.
For example, a Kafka connector expects a bootstrap.servers entry as well as a topic entry.
The Reactive Messaging implementation reads the global application configuration and must support the following format:
-
mp.messaging.incoming.[channel-name].[attribute]=[value]
-
mp.messaging.outgoing.[channel-name].[attribute]=[value]
-
mp.messaging.connector.[connector-name].[attribute]=[value]
For each extracted channel-name
:
-
The
connector
attribute of the channel is read, and the connector implementation identified. If no loadable connector implementation matches, the deployment must be failed with aDeploymentException
; -
Relevant attributes are those matching either the
channel-name
or the resolvedconnector-name
. -
Relevant attributes are processed to generate a
Config
object containing onlyattribute=value
entries. If is valid to have an attribute specified at a connector level and also for a specific channel. If an attribute appears for both a channel and its relevant connector, the channel specific value will be used. In the example below, theacme.kafka
default value forbootstrap.servers
is overridden formy-channel
to be9096
.
The following snippet gives an example for a hypothetical Kafka connector:
mp.messaging.incoming.my-channel.connector=acme.kafka
mp.messaging.incoming.my-channel.bootstrap.servers=localhost:9096
mp.messaging.incoming.my-channel.topic=my-topic
mp.messaging.connector.acme.kafka.bootstrap.servers=localhost:9092
For properties that have a mp.messaging.incoming.
or mp.messaging.outgoing
prefix,
this prefix is stripped off the property name and the remainder of the property name
up to the first occurrence of .
is treated as the channel name. Channel names may not
include the .
character.
For properties that have a mp.messaging.connector.
prefix, this prefix is stripped off the property name and
the longest remaining prefix that matches any configured connector
is treated as a connector name.
The remainder of the property name, minus the expected initial .
separator, is taken
as the name of an attribute for this connector. For example bootstrap.servers
appears as a
default attribute for all channels that use the acme.kafka
connector.
The Reactive Messaging implementation:
-
Reads the configuration
-
Identifies that a
my-channel
source needs to be managed -
Searches for the
connector
attribute and findsacme.kafka
-
Looks for a bean implementing the
IncomingConnectorFactory
interface qualified with@Connector("acme.kafka")
. If the configuration had contained amp.messaging.outgoing.my-channel…
entry, a bean implementing theOutgoingConnectorFactory
interface would have been searched for. -
Creates a new
Config
object with just the relevantkey=value
pairs:bootstrap.servers=localhost:9096 topic=my-topic
-
Calls the
PublisherBuilder<? extends Message> getPublisherBuilder(Config config)
method with the createdConfig
object. If the configuration is invalid, the connector can throw:-
a
NoSuchElementException
if a mandatory attribute is missing in the configuration -
an
IllegalArgumentException
if the initialization of the connector fails for any other reasons.The Reactive Messaging implementation catches these exceptions and wraps them into a
DeploymentException
, failing the deployment of the application.
-
-
The built
PublisherBuilder
is connected to a method using the@Incoming("my-stream")
annotation. The implementation of the connector must map every received message to anorg.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
. Optionally, it can provide its own implementation oforg.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
providing additional metadata.
The configuration passed to the IncomingConnectorFactory
and OutgoingConnectorFactory
contains at least the:
-
channel-name
attribute indicating the name of the channel being configured, -
connector
attribute must match the name given to the@Connector
qualifier.
Connector attribute
To help tools (IDEs, documentation generator) to extract the configuration of each connector, the specification provides the org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.spi.ConnectorAttribute
annotation for implementations to create a good ecosystem with the tools.
However, the support for this SPI is not mandatory.
When used, each attribute supported by the connector should be documented using this annotation. The following snippet provides an example of a connector using the annotation:
@ConnectorAttribute(name = "bootstrap.servers", alias = "kafka.bootstrap.servers", type = "string",
defaultValue = "localhost:9092", direction = Direction.INCOMING_AND_OUTGOING,
description = "...")
@ConnectorAttribute(name = "topic", type = "string", direction = Direction.INCOMING_AND_OUTGOING,
description = "...")
@ConnectorAttribute(name = "value-deserialization-failure-handler", type = "string", direction = Direction.INCOMING,
description = "...")
@ConnectorAttribute(name = "merge", direction = OUTGOING, type = "boolean", defaultValue = "false",
description = "...")
@Connector("my-connector")
public class MyConnector implements IncomingConnectorFactory, OutgoingConnectorFactory {
// ...
}
As a result, tools can extract the supported attributes and improve the user experience.
Acknowledgement
The connector is responsible for the acknowledgment (positive or negative) of the incoming and outgoing messages:
-
An incoming connector must only acknowledge the received message when the produced
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
is acknowledged. -
An incoming connector must handle received negative acknowledgment.
-
An outgoing connector must acknowledge the incoming
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
once it has successfully dispatched the message. -
An outgoing connector must acknowledge negatively the incoming
org.eclipse.microprofile.reactive.messaging.Message
if it cannot be dispatched.
Metrics
When MicroProfile Reactive Messaging is used in an environment where MicroProfile Metrics is enabled, the Reactive Messaging implementation automatically produces metrics.
The following metrics are produced for each channel declared by the application and are added to the base
scope.
Name | Type | Unit | Description |
---|---|---|---|
|
Counter |
None |
The number of messages sent on the named channel. |
Injecting a Publisher or PublisherBuilder
You can receive messages from a channel by injecting either a Publisher
or PublisherBuilder
and using the @Channel
qualifier to specify the channel name:
@ApplicationScoped
public class BeanInjectedWithAPublisherOfPayloads {
private final Publisher<String> constructor;
@Inject
@Channel("hello")
private Publisher<String> field;
@Inject
public BeanInjectedWithAPublisherOfPayloads(@Channel("bonjour") Publisher<String> constructor) {
this.constructor = constructor;
}
public List<String> consume() {
return Flowable
.concat(
Flowable.fromPublisher(constructor),
Flowable.fromPublisher(field))
.toList()
.blockingGet();
}
}
You can then inject BeanInjectedWithAPublisherOfPayloads
to JAX-RS resources.
The value hello in the above example indicates the name of the channel.
For a payload type X
, the following types can be injected:
-
Publisher<X>
-
PublisherBuilder<X>
-
Publisher<Message<X>>
-
PublisherBuilder<Message<X>>
Publishing messages to a channel from imperative code
Traditionally, the reactive world and imperative world are separated and operate in parallel. Reactive Messaging deals with streams of data in the reactive world, while the imperative world is pretty much point to point and synchronous communication. However, imperative programme sometimes needs to connect to reactive streams so that responses can be emitted to a destination service. Bridging the two worlds is very valuable thing to do, so that one microservice can use technologies from both environments. For an instance, a JAX-RS resource might want to publish messages to a Reactive Messaging channel. This section is about enabling imperative code to publish messages to a Reactive Messaging channel, so that it can be consumed by a consumer.
You can inject an Emitter
and use it to send either payloads (X
) or messages (Message<X>
) to a channel as demonstrated below.
@Inject @Channel("myChannel")
private Emitter<String> emitter;
public void publishMessage() {
emitter.send("a");
emitter.send("b");
emitter.complete();
}
When sending payload, the send
method returns a CompletionStage
.
This CompletionStage
is completed when the emitted message is acknowledged.
If the processing of the emitter message fails, the returned CompletionStage
is completed exceptionally.
@Inject
@Channel("foo")
private Emitter<String> emitter;
public void run() {
emitter.send(Message.of("a"));
emitter.send(Message.of("b"));
emitter.send(Message.of("c"));
}
When sending a Message
, the send
message does not return CompletionStage
.
However, you can create a Message
configured with custom ack
and nack
functions.
When injecting an Emitter
(e.g. @Inject Emitter<T>
), you must specify the target channel name using the @Channel
qualifier.
You can then configure how the back pressure is handled via @OnOverflow
annotation, for the situation where emitting messages/payloads faster than the consumption of the messages.
@Inject @Channel("myChannel")
@OnOverflow(value=OnOverflow.Strategy.BUFFER, bufferSize=300)
private Emitter<String> emitter;
public void publishMessage() {
emitter.send("a");
emitter.send("b");
emitter.complete();
}
In the above snippet, the buffer size is set to 300 elements. If @OnOverflow
is absent, the buffer strategy OnOverflow.Strategy.BUFFER
will be used.
If the bufferSize
is not specified, the size will be the value of the config property mp.messaging.emitter.default-buffer-size
.
If the property does not exist, the default value will be 128 elements. If the buffer is full, an error will be propagated.
The value attribute on OnOverflow
is shown below:
-
OnOverflow.Strategy.BUFFER
- use a buffer, whose size will be determined by the value ofbufferSize
if set. Otherwise, the size will be the value of the config propertymp.messaging.emitter.default-buffer-size
if it exists. Otherwise, 128 will be used. If the buffer is full, an exception will be thrown from thesend
method. -
OnOverflow.Strategy.UNBOUNDED_BUFFER
- use an unbounded buffer. The application may run out of memory if values are continually added faster than they are consumed. -
OnOverflow.Stragegy.THROW_EXCEPTION
- throws an exception from thesend
method if the downstream can’t keep up. -
OnOverflow.Strategy.DROP
- drops the most recent value if the downstream can’t keep up. It means that new value emitted by the emitter are ignored. -
OnOverflow.Strategy.FAIL
- propagates a failure in case the downstream can’t keep up. No more value will be emitted. -
OnOverflow.Strategy.LATEST
- keeps only the latest value, dropping any previous value if the downstream can’t keep up. -
OnOverflow.Strategy.NONE
- ignores the back pressure signals letting the downstream consumer to implement a strategy.
Below are some examples:
@Inject
@Channel("myChannel")
@OnOverflow(value = OnOverflow.Strategy.BUFFER) // Buffer strategy using the buffer size specified by _mp.messaging.emitter.default-buffer-size_ if exists. Otherwise, 128 will be used.
Emitter<String> emitter;
@Inject
@Channel("myChannel") // Buffer strategy will be used. It behaves as if @OnOverflow(value = OnOverflow.Strategy.BUFFER) is present.
Emitter<String> emitter;
@Inject
@Channel("myChannel")
@OnOverflow(value = OnOverflow.Strategy.DROP) // Drop the most recent values
Emitter<String> emitter;
Since the @Channel("myChannel")
is used to produce messages, a consumer with the @Incoming("myChannel")
should be specified to consume the messages transiting on the channel myChannel.
Assembly and validation
When the application starts, the Reactive Messaging implementation:
-
connect the methods annotated with
@Incoming
,@Outgoing
,Emitter
,@Channel
and connectors -
verify the validity of the resulting graph
Implementations must throw a DeploymentException
when the application starts for any of the following conditions:
-
A method with
@Incoming
has no upstream channel -
A method with
@Outgoing
has no downstream channel -
A method with
@Incoming
has multiple upstream channels -
A method with
@Outgoing
has multiple downstream channels -
An
Emitter
has no downstream channel -
An
Emitter
has multiple downstream channels -
An injected
@Channel
has no upstream channel -
An injected
@Channel
has multiple upstream channels -
The application configures a missing connector
-
An incoming connector has no downstream channels
-
An incoming connector has multiple downstream channels
-
An outgoing connector has no upstream channels
-
An outgoing connector has multiple upstream channels
Release Notes for MicroProfile Reactive Messaging 3.0
A full list of changes delivered in the 3.0 release can be found at MicroProfile Reactive Messaging 3.0 Milestone.
Incompatible Changes
This release aligns with Jakarta EE 9.1 (137), so it won’t work with earlier versions of Jakarta or Java EE.
API/SPI Changes
-
Acknowledgement doesn’t work with default Message.of(T,ack, nack)(#143)
Release Notes for MicroProfile Reactive Messaging 2.0
A full list of changes delivered in the 2.0 release can be found at MicroProfile Reactive Messaging 2.0 Milestone.
Functional Changes
-
Add support for unmanaged stream injection using
@Inject @Channel(…)
(#3) -
Add support for emitters allowing emitting messages from imperative code (#70)
-
Add support for metrics (#31)
-
Add support for negative acknowledgement (#98)
-
Update default acknowledgement strategy when dealing with
Message
(#97) -
Move metrics to the base scope (#93)
-
Assembly validation on application start (#119)
-
Add
@ConnectorAttribute
to allow connector configuration discovery (#94) -
Add negative acknowledgement support (#98])
Incompatible Changes
-
Spec dependencies marked as "provided" (#88)
Other Changes
-
Update to Jakarta EE8 APIs for MP 4.0 (75)