API review
Proposer: Brian Gerkey
Present at review:
- Josh Faust
- Tully Foote
- Ken Conley
Question / concerns / comments
Enter your thoughts on the API and any questions / concerns you have here. Please sign your name. Anything you want to address in the API review should be marked down here before the start of the meeting.
- Ken: rospack_ prefix nomenclature is a misnomer and klunky, but probably not worth changing at this point.
- Josh: rospack_is_test_harness is poorly named.
- Ken should write a script to validate usage of rospack(package_name)
Meeting agenda
To be filled out by proposer based on comments gathered during API review period
Conclusion
Package status change mark change manifest)
![/!\](./rostheme/img/alert.png "/!\")
Action items that need to be taken. 
Major issues that need to be resolved - rospack_is_test_harness -> rospack_declare_test
- write a Hudson script to audit rospack(package_name) (not required for release)
API Conditional Pass