vision_opencv/Reviews/2010-01-10_Doc_Review

Reviewer:

• kwc

Instructions for doing a doc review

See DocReviewProcess for more instructions

1. Does the documentation define the Users of the Stack, i.e. for the expected usages of the Stack, which APIs will users engage with?
2. Are all of these APIs documented?
3. Do relevant usages have associated tutorials?

4. Have all Packages in the Stack been API reviewed?

5. Does the Stack conform to the StackDocumentation guidelines?

6. Are there Packages in the Stack that don't belong

Concerns / issues

need description of image_geometry. I went and added some more guidance about opencv2 vs. cv_bridge

link to opencv bug tracker, users list

Conclusion

Doc review (pending updates)